Hot Coffee
Hot Coffee presents a critical look at the American civil justice system and the corporate-driven tort reform movement. It centers around the infamous McDonald’s coffee case, in which Stella Liebeck sued the fast-food giant after suffering severe burns from spilled coffee. This case, often misrepresented in the media, serves as a starting point to explore broader issues within the legal system.
The film reveals the true story behind Liebeck’s case, detailing the extent of her injuries and the reasoning behind the jury’s decision. It challenges common misconceptions about the lawsuit, which has been widely cited as an example of frivolous litigation. Through Liebeck’s story, the documentary illustrates how corporate interests have manipulated public perception of the civil justice system.
Beyond the coffee case, the film presents three additional stories that highlight different aspects of tort reform. These include the impact of damage caps on victims of medical malpractice, the influence of corporate money in judicial elections, and the consequences of mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts. Each narrative demonstrates how tort reform measures can limit individuals’ access to justice and shift power towards corporations.
The documentary also exposes the extensive public relations campaigns funded by major corporations and organizations like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. These campaigns aim to portray the legal system as overrun with frivolous lawsuits, thereby garnering support for tort reform measures. By tracing the money trail from corporations to politicians, the film reveals the motivations behind the push for tort reform and its potential consequences for ordinary citizens seeking accountability through the courts.